资料图:日本福岛第一核电站。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
春晚+《中国诗词大会》接力赋能,古井贡酒春节档又“添把火”?****** “年,谷熟也。” 在中国人眼中最神圣的“年”,最初的本意是指谷物成熟。甲骨文里的“年”字,上方是个禾苗的形状,下方是个弯着腰的“人”形,整个字形便是一个人扛着成熟的庄稼回家的情景。 在古老的农耕社会,谷物成熟自然是至关重要之事。因此,以谷物成熟周期引申而成的“年”,便成了华夏民族最隆重的节日。 历经上下五千年的传承和丰富,如今的“年”有了各种各样的习俗,比如守岁,贴春联,迎财神,祭神爷,放鞭炮,穿新衣,吃饺子…… 新世纪里,年俗里又新添了看《中国诗词大会》,喝古井贡酒。 1月25日,正月初四,由“中国酿·世界香”古井贡酒·年份原浆古20独家冠名播出的《2023中国诗词大会》如约而至、正式开播。 首期节目围绕主题词“欢喜”,热热闹闹地开启了新一季的诗意遨游。 为何“欢喜”? 秉承“赏中华诗词,寻文化基因,品生活之美”的宗旨,《2023中国诗词大会》围绕“欢喜、寻味、燃、寒暑、先生、本来、心动、天下、十年、远方”十个关键词,以“欢喜”为始,以“远方”为盼,回归诗意的共同落点,给人以穿越凛冬的温暖力量,再掀“全家老少齐上阵,天南地北共此情”的收视浪潮。 “欢喜”不仅是一种精神状态,更是一种价值追求和理想情怀。 点评嘉宾、北京师范大学文学院教授康震,借用中国古典诗词为观众普及了人生之中各式各样的欢喜:有大功告成的狂喜“仰天大笑出门去,我辈岂是蓬蒿人”;有人生自得的欣喜,“休对故人国,国,且将新火试新茶。诗酒趁年华”;更有心怀天下,激励民众的大欢喜,“喜看稻菽千重浪,遍地英雄下夕烟”。 “踏遍青山人未老,风景这边独好。”在中央民族大学历史文化学院教授蒙曼看来,又一个春天如约而至,有团聚就有力量,有春天就有希望,新的一年,满载着希望和力量出发,即是迎接岁月静好的“小欢喜”,更是迎接国泰民安的“大欢喜”。 值得一提的是,节目还将相对抽象的主题,化作一个个生动鲜活的时代切面,在纵横古今、纵贯南北的人间烟火中,激发人们对“欢喜”的丰富感知与无限遐想:它是欢悦庆升平的“岁朝图”,是北京深秋农家小院里甜蜜蜜、亮晶晶的大柿子,是浙江安吉余村“绿遍山原白满川,子规声里雨如烟”的美好模样,是我们透过中国航天人的眼睛“遥望齐州九点烟,一泓海水杯中泻”的油然自豪,是千年非遗绝技打铁花“炉火照天地,红星乱紫烟”的流光溢彩………… 当观众从触手可及的现实场景中,聆听诗意穿梭千年留下的壮阔回响,古老的诗词也就获得了与时代相拥、为生活赋能的新的生命力。 “欢喜”中的隐藏线索 在首期节目中,有一道很有意思的题目,需要参赛选手根据“后代称欢伯,前贤号圣人”“应呼钓诗钩,亦号扫愁帚”“三杯通大道,一斗合自然”“举杯邀明月,对影成三人”等四句诗句线索,猜出一种饮品。 答案毫无悬念:酒。 节目主持人龙洋表示,将“酒”列入“欢喜”的线索题里,很有深意。在她看来,酒,可以是最孤独的人喝,也可以是最热闹的人喝,可以是最豪放的人喝,也可以是最温情的人喝,是每个人日常生活中不可或缺的存在。 康震也提出,酒在中国人的生活里扮演着重要的角色。中国人爱酒从对酒的命名中就可以体现。“应呼钓诗钩,亦号扫愁帚”出自苏轼《洞庭春色》一诗,写的是苏轼当时的好友将所酿之酒取名“洞庭春色”,既是好酒之誉,也蕴含着主人对祖国山河的美好想象,李白也有诗云“巴陵无限酒,醉杀洞庭秋”。 康震认为,“酒,在这时候就不是酒了,是一种燃烧的激情”。 蒙曼从古人对酒的别称中,总结“酒可以给人带来快乐”。“欢伯”一说,最早出在汉代焦延寿的《易林·坎之兑》中,“酒为欢伯,除忧来乐”认为,酒能消除人的烦恼与忧愁,使人快乐。 此外,酒还有“清圣”“浊贤”之说。在北宋时期李昉等撰写的《太平御览》《魏略》中有记载:“太祖(曹操)时禁酒而人窃饮之,故难言酒,以白酒为贤人,清酒为圣人”。以“圣贤”代酒,足见对酒之欢喜。 年+文化+酒=古井贡酒 《中国诗词大会》是国家语言文字工作委员会、中央广播电视总台推出、由中央电视台科教频道自主研发的原创文化类电视节目。它把中国最影响深远的诗词搬上综艺节目的舞台,以比拼竞赛的形式,寓教于乐,让中华优秀传统文化的继承与发扬有了全民基础。 癸卯兔年,时值《中国诗词大会》陪伴观众“文化过年”的第八个年头。不知不觉守候它的开播,早已成了全家老小、天南地北的年味之选。 据统计,该节目前七季收视总计超过30亿人次,在全社会形成了诗词热、国学热、国风热和文物热,成为观众春节假期不可或缺的“精神陪伴”。 而古井贡酒同样是“年文化”的倡导者与同行者。 自2016年,古井贡酒携手央视春晚,向全国人民拜大年。中国人的过年记忆中,又加了一个“喝古井”,“过大年、喝古井、看春晚”成为一句流行语,响遍大江南北,深入人心。古井贡酒历经十年研发的“年份原浆·年三十”,更是以“年三十”为名,彻底与年文化深度绑定。 此外,古井还围绕“年”,成立古井贡酒文化研究院,遍邀白酒业、文化界专家围绕“年”展开一系列文化研究。通过发掘“年”文化的深厚内涵,形成了独具特色的古井文化道路,展现了古井贡酒传承与传播中国文化的名酒担当。 也正是“传承和弘扬传统文化”的同一个初心,让古井贡酒与《中国诗词大会》走到一起。 2022年,古井贡酒牵手《中国诗词大会》。此次再度冠名、同框亮相,在新春佳节的喜庆、祥和中,二者携手汇聚起传统文化所蕴含的民族向心力,不仅激发起国人以诗为桨、破浪前行的力量与勇气,也表达了古井贡酒“寻文化之根、铸民族之魂,举杯古20,畅饮中国酿”的美好愿望,从而让全世界见证了“中国酿世界香”的魅力。
|